As well as individual species dying out, there have been five mass extinctions that obliterated swathes of species. The Act aspires to prevent extinction, recover imperiled plants and animals, and protect the ecosystems on which they depend.
Nature provides us with beauty. These benefits, which most of us take for granted, are called "ecosystem services". The Act protects the ecosystems upon which imperiled wildlife and many other species, including humans, depend.
We love walking in the dappled sunlight of an old forest, or scuba-diving over a coral reef. The first problem with this argument is that it spells doom for all those animals and plants that people are less fond of: So if we decide to save the mountain gorillas, by extension we are also choosing to preserve the particular habitat they live in and the majority of the species that live alongside them.
One simple example is safari holidays that take tourists to see mountain gorillas. But it does mean ensuring that ecosystems are as rich and diverse as possible.
There is also nothing to eat, so you must artificially make food. The Act has been successful — no law has been more important in preventing the extinction of wildlife, including bald eagles, gray whales and the peregrine falcon. In particular, they help ensure a regular water supply.
Landowners receive assurances from FWS that if the species is listed, they will not be required to take any conservation measures beyond those to which they have already agreed.
To understand how much we rely on ecosystem services, imagine a world where humans are the only species — perhaps in a spaceship far from Earth. Pollinating insects like bumblebees are an obvious example.
An HCP negotiated with a developer, land owner, or state or local government describes the anticipated effects of proposed activities on certain listed species, includes a list of conservation measures to minimize and mitigate the impact of incidental takings as much as is practical, and lists the funding available to implement the plan.
This is good news for people living on the lowlands. Surely there are some species we would be better off without. Too many visitors can also disrupt gorilla societies.
He may well be right that any such system would be open to abuse. Ecotourism offers a way to make the beauty of nature pay for itself The people running those holidays have a clear incentive to keep the animals safe.
The counter-argument is that without such a system, the abuse happens anyway — which is why many conservation groups now support putting a value on ecosystems.
You could synthesise chemicals like sugars and fats, but making it appetising would be extremely hard. The most obvious is the staggering cost involved.
View image of Coral reefs support a rich variety of beautiful organisms Credit: The blood of mountain gorillas is unlikely to contain a cure for cancer. View image of Gorilla habitat is home to all sorts of species Credit: It does sometimes lead to useful new things, but it comes with a host of problems.
It needs to be resilient. Some of these legislative attacks could prevent citizens from taking action to hold the government accountable for failing to adequately protect our most imperiled species. And many species protected under the law are on the pathway to recovery. The gorillas are their livelihood, and running these tours may well pay better than other occupations like farming.
There needs to be a more practical reason to keep species around. Still, at first glance it does seem like the idea of ecosystem services should push us towards a rather selective approach to conservation.
Mace calls this line of thinking " nature for itself ".World Wildlife Fund is committed to endangered species protection.
See how we are ensuring that the world our children inherit will be home to. Currently, more than 3, species of animals are considered endangered.
In the United States, the Endangered Species Act was passed in to help with conservation efforts, but there are now three times as many endangered species as. The Endangered Species Act is designed to protect not only large, charismatic wildlife such as grizzly bears and bald eagles, but also species that are more obscure, yet equally unique and critical to the web of life.
Congress answered this question in the preamble to the Endangered Species Act ofrecognizing that endangered and threatened species of wildlife and plants "are of esthetic, ecological, educational, historical, recreational, and scientific value to the Nation and its people." In this statement.
What is the point of saving endangered species? Saving all the endangered marine species might well cost far more. Why should we spend all that money on wildlife when we could spend it to stop.
Should we protect endangered species? 81% Say Yes 19% Say No Yes, we should protect endangered species, because we ourselves are an endangered species. Humans became an endangered species with the invention of the nuclear bomb.
River and more we need them in are live no one wants to live a life without seeing thing. Report Post. .Download